Edge Caching vs CDN: Which Should You Choose in 2025?
The line between CDNs and edge caching has blurred significantly. Traditional CDNs now offer compute capabilities, while edge caching solutions provide global distribution. This guide helps you choose the right approach for your specific needs.
Understanding the Difference
Traditional CDN
Purpose: Cache and serve static content globally
Best for: Images, videos, CSS, JavaScript files
Logic: Cache-Control headers, origin pull
Examples: CloudFront, Cloudflare CDN, Fastly
Edge Caching
Purpose: Cache dynamic content with compute at the edge
Best for: API responses, personalized content, real-time data
Logic: Custom logic, ML-powered decisions
Examples: Cloudflare Workers, Lambda@Edge, Cachee.ai
When to Use a Traditional CDN
CDNs excel at serving static assets globally:
- Static websites: HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images
- Media streaming: Video, audio files
- Software downloads: Installers, updates
- Simple caching rules: Cache everything with fixed TTL
CDN Limitations
- Limited dynamic content support
- Basic cache key options
- No custom logic execution
- Simple invalidation only
When to Use Edge Caching
Edge caching is essential for dynamic, personalized content:
- API responses: Cache GET requests intelligently
- Personalized content: User-specific but cacheable data
- Real-time data: Stock prices, sports scores with short TTL
- A/B testing: Serve variants at the edge
- Authentication: Validate tokens without origin round-trip
Edge Caching Advantages
- Custom cache logic per request
- ML-powered TTL optimization
- Compute at 200+ global locations
- Sub-20ms response times globally
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Traditional CDN | Edge Caching |
|---|---|---|
| Static content | Excellent | Excellent |
| Dynamic content | Limited | Excellent |
| Custom logic | No | Yes |
| ML optimization | No | Yes |
| Personalization | Limited | Full support |
| Setup complexity | Simple | Moderate |
| Cost (1B requests/mo) | $500-2,000 | $1,000-5,000 |
The Hybrid Approach
Most production systems use both:
- CDN layer: Cache static assets (images, CSS, JS)
- Edge caching layer: Cache API responses intelligently
- Origin: Handle cache misses and writes
This layered approach maximizes cache hit rates while keeping infrastructure simple.
Cost Considerations
CDNs are cheaper for static content, but edge caching provides better ROI for dynamic content:
- CDN: Pay per GB transferred, cheap for static files
- Edge caching: Pay per request, worth it for expensive origin calls
If your origin API costs $0.01/request and edge caching achieves 90% hit rate, you save $0.009/request—easily covering edge caching costs.
Making the Decision
Choose CDN if:
- Primarily serving static assets
- Simple caching rules suffice
- Budget is the primary concern
- No personalization needed
Choose Edge Caching if:
- Caching API responses
- Need custom cache logic
- Serving personalized content
- Require ML-powered optimization
- Global sub-50ms latency is critical
Conclusion
The choice between CDN and edge caching depends on your content type. Static sites thrive on traditional CDNs. Dynamic applications with APIs benefit from intelligent edge caching. Most production systems use both layers together for optimal performance.
Get the best of both worlds
Cachee.ai provides intelligent edge caching with ML-powered optimization for dynamic content.
Start Free Trial